Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:28:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:28:27 -0500 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:28941 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:28:13 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 16:26:11 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Davidsen To: Bob Miller cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.7 acct.c oops In-Reply-To: <20020321113829.A1543@doc.pdx.osdl.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Bob Miller wrote: > # The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log > # -------------------------------------------- > # 02/03/21 rem@doc.pdx.osdl.net 1.538 > # Fixed acct.c code by removing the BUG_ON code because it doesn't work > # on UP systems. > # -------------------------------------------- Please help my education... after looking at the code, I don't see why the BUG_ON was removed rather than made dependent on SMP, assuming that the BK comment and my hasty reading of code actually mean that it did work for SMP. Is this a solid "can't happen" now and no test needed, or is a better test in the works, or ??? I didn't try to compile it, so there may be something I'm totally missing. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/