Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759581AbZJMLwQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:52:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759567AbZJMLwP (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:52:15 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:45893 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759546AbZJMLwO (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:52:14 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [Patchs vs. percpu-next] Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically allocate counters Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 22:21:34 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-15-generic; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) Cc: Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , Tejun Heo , Eric Dumazet , Pekka Enberg References: <20091001212521.123389189@gentwo.org> <200910062034.40864.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910132221.35208.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 608 Lines: 21 On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 04:27:53 am Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > Does this mean we can kill local.h soon? > > Can we remove local.h from modules? This looks sweet to me! Only comment: not sure struct module_ref is required once we have __percpu markers. Acked-by: Rusty Russell Thanks! Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/