Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761340AbZJMVGl (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:06:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760679AbZJMVGk (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:06:40 -0400 Received: from smtp2.ultrahosting.com ([74.213.174.253]:52024 "EHLO smtp.ultrahosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751578AbZJMVGk (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:06:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:28:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@gentwo.org To: David Rientjes cc: Pekka Enberg , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers , Mel Gorman , Zhang Yanmin Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V6 7/7] this_cpu: slub aggressive use of this_cpu operations in the hotpaths In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20091007211024.442168959@gentwo.org> <20091007211053.378634196@gentwo.org> <4AD307A5.105@kernel.org> <84144f020910120614r529d8e4em9babe83a90e9371f@mail.gmail.com> <4AD4D8B6.6010700@cs.helsinki.fi> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 609 Lines: 15 On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, David Rientjes wrote: > For an optimized fastpath, I'd expect such a workload would result in at > least a slightly higher transfer rate. There will be no improvements if the load is dominated by the instructions in the network layer or caching issues. None of that is changed by the path. It only reduces the cycle count in the fastpath. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/