Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761942AbZJNQAD (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:00:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761931AbZJNP77 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:59:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7300 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761930AbZJNP75 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:59:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:58:48 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, paulus@samba.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, efault@gmx.de, fweisbec@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:perf/urgent] perf tools: Fix the NO_64BIT build on pure 64-bit systems Message-ID: <20091014155848.GB15193@ghostprotocols.net> References: <20091013140915.96cfe060.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20091014062052.GD784@elte.hu> <20091014074404.98577824.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091014074404.98577824.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> X-Url: http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/blog User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2661 Lines: 65 Em Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 07:44:04AM -0700, Randy Dunlap escreveu: > On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:20:52 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > * Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:34:16 GMT tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > Commit-ID: 55621ccf2b7a8afe39df8c80f55b28424fd07d13 > > > > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/55621ccf2b7a8afe39df8c80f55b28424fd07d13 > > > > Author: Ingo Molnar > > > > AuthorDate: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:57:25 +0200 > > > > Committer: Ingo Molnar > > > > CommitDate: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:00:27 +0200 > > > > > > > > perf tools: Fix the NO_64BIT build on pure 64-bit systems > > > > > > > > Randy Dunlap reported that 'make NO_64BIT=1' fails to build > > > > a pure 32-b it binary on 64-bit/64-bit x86 systems. > > > > > > > > The reason is that we dont pass in the -m32 and GCC defaults > > > > to -m64. > > > > > > > > So pass it in - and also extend the warning message about libelf > > > > dependencies - glibc-dev[el] is needed as well beyond the libelf > > > > library. > > > > > > Ingo, thanks, I finally got this working, after installing more 32-bit > > > libs etc., like Kyle said that I would need to do. > > > > > > The error message is still a little misleading/confusing: > > > Makefile:426: *** No libelf.h/libelf found, please install libelf-dev/elfutils-libelf-devel and glibc-dev[el]. Stop. > > > > > > when elfutils-libelf-devel.i586 is installed but glibc-devel.i[56]86 is not > > > installed. gcc failed with: > > > In file included from /usr/include/features.h:376, > > > from /usr/include/sys/types.h:27, > > > from /usr/include/libelf.h:53, > > > from elfdeveltest.c:1: > > > /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file or directory > > > > Why is it misleading? It says it very clearly that you need to install > > both: > > > > please install libelf-dev/elfutils-libelf-devel and glibc-dev[el]. Stop. > > It also says very clearly: > > Makefile:426: *** No libelf.h/libelf found > > which is not correct. So the correct way is to first look for the presence of glibc-devel, barf if its not present, then after that, do what is done now and test for the presence of libelf.h :-\ But if one just follows the suggestion, and installs the suggested packages, it should work, no? - Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/