Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 02:51:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 02:51:01 -0500 Received: from 198.216-123-194-0.interbaun.com ([216.123.194.198]:9993 "EHLO mail.harddata.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 02:50:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 00:50:37 -0700 From: Michal Jaegermann To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: max partition size Message-ID: <20020322005037.A9256@mail.harddata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Who knows for sure what is the current upper limit on ext2/ext3 file system size (4KiB blocks as this is what tools will accept)? It definitely is not 1 TB as we were making working partition nearly twice that. But practice seems to indicate that 2 TB, or whereabout, can be too much. Is this a property of a file system or we bumping into block device boundaries or this are just tools? BTW - mke2fs goes most of the way but gets stuck eventually when writing inode tables if that it is too close to 2 TB. Yes, there are people who really want that much of a file system or maybe even more. :-) This was not done for a sake of a record. Michal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/