Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 03:35:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 03:34:59 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:56324 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 03:34:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:34:39 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: dd8ne@bnv-bamberg.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.7 does not compile Message-ID: <20020322093439.S22861@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , dd8ne@bnv-bamberg.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3C9A0735.8999EBB3@wanadoo.fr> <20020321173953.F22861@suse.de> <20020322.6534800@dd8ne.ofr.de.ampr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 06:53:48AM +0000, Hans-Joachim Hetscher wrote: > It seeems to be the same bug in 6pack.c > So, I solved the problem in line 259 of 6pack.c by changing > dev->last_rx = jiffies; > into > sp->dev->last_rx = jiffies; Yeah, it's a mystery how these broken versions of the fixes ended up in Jeff's tree. He took them from my tree, and my tree already has this and the previous corrected fix. really weird. anyways, it's moot as all this is going to Jeff at the end of the week anyway for his pushing to Linus on his return the following week 8-) -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/