Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:09:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:09:35 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:22510 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:09:26 -0500 Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 21:10:46 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Theodore Tso , David Rees , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mke2fs (and mkreiserfs) core dumps Message-ID: <20020318051046.GD2254@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , David Rees , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020313123114.A11658@greenhydrant.com> <20020313205537.GC429@turbolinux.com> <20020313133748.A12472@greenhydrant.com> <20020313215420.GD429@turbolinux.com> <20020315182355.A1123@thunk.org> <20020317072653.GB1150@turbolinux.com> <20020317183752.GB27249@matchmail.com> <20020318030317.GC1150@turbolinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 08:03:17PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Mar 17, 2002 10:37 -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 12:26:53AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > > Yes, I have always considered this a kernel bug (introduced in 2.4.10), > > > but my (admittedly feeble) attempts to get it fixed were not accepted. > > > At one point I thought a fix went into 2.4.18-pre[12] or so, but I > > > guess not. I haven't tried in a while, so maybe I should make another > > > attempt. > > > > > > > Was that part of the 2.4.10-pre11 -aa VM merge, or was it from another > > seperate patch? > > Well, at the same time as Linus merged -aa VM, he also merged > blockdev-in-pagecache from -aa. This caused this problem, among others. Ahh yes, I remember now. > With blockdev-in-pagecache, the kernel thinks block device access is the > same as reading a file, so it imposes file limits. It also caused the Right. > problem that the block device (pagecache) and the filesystem (buffer > cache) were not coherent, causing e2fsck, tune2fs, etc to not work. > This was fixed in 2.4.12 I believe. I also heard one offhand remark that similar problems have crept back into the kernel recently. Is that true? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/