Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:10:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:09:54 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:37134 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 5 Dec 2000 22:09:49 -0500 Message-ID: <3A2DA6BE.B233AEF6@transmeta.com> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 18:38:54 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Organization: Transmeta Corporation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-test11 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, sv, no, da, es, fr, ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Kai Germaschewski , Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: That horrible hack from hell called A20 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > Right now this is my interim patch (to clean test11). The thing to note is > > that I decreased the keyboard controller timeout by a factor of about 167, > > while making the "delay" a bit longer. > > Oh, btw, I forgot to ask people to give this a whirl. I assume it fixes > the APM problems for Kai. > > It definitely won't fix the silly Olivetti M4 issue (we still touch bit #2 > in 0x92). We'll need to fix that by testing A20 before bothering with the > 0x92 stuff. Alan, that should get fixed in 2.2.x too - clearly those > Olivetti machines can be considered buggy, but even so.. > > Who else had trouble with the keyboard controller? > Some IBM Aptiva box... -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/