Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755136AbZJRSvn (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:51:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755112AbZJRSvm (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:51:42 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:34749 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755058AbZJRSvm (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:51:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:27:43 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Greg KH Cc: david@lang.hm, Stefan Richter , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: removing existing working drivers via staging Message-ID: <20091017172743.GE1526@ucw.cz> References: <4AD74ED7.9070501@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20091015164726.GA10125@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091015164726.GA10125@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1799 Lines: 41 On Thu 2009-10-15 09:47:26, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:39:51AM -0700, david@lang.hm wrote: > > however, what I think I saw proposed was to move drivers that need to be > > 'cleaned up', to staging and then dropping them if they don't get cleaned. > > What is "proposed" is the following: > > - For drivers currently in the kernel tree, that the subsystem > maintainer, for whatever reason, feels is obsolete / broken / > needs major cleaning / wants to get rid of, can be submitted > to the staging maintainer to be moved to the drivers/staging/ > directory. > - For a file to be moved into this directory, all of the normal > staging rules apply, including most importantly, a TODO file > listing what needs to be done to the driver in order for it to > be moved back into the main portion of the kernel tree. > - If, after a period of 3 releases, no work has been done on the > driver by anyone, the driver will be removed from the staging > tree, just like all drivers in the staging tree. > > Note, as always, if a driver wants to come back from removal of the > staging tree, a simple email to the staging maintainer, along with the > promise that work will be done, is all it takes to resurrect it. > > Sound good? > > Now, where to put these "rules"? Any suggestions? I'm not sure it sounds good. It should not be named 'staging' at least. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/