Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750971AbZJSEJp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:09:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750800AbZJSEJo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:09:44 -0400 Received: from relay.atmel.no ([80.232.32.139]:61360 "EHLO relay.atmel.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750784AbZJSEJo (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:09:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:09:31 +0900 From: Haavard Skinnemoen To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] consider stack access while checking for alternate signal stack Message-ID: <20091019130931.6d8f0340@hskinnemoen-d830> In-Reply-To: <20091018191247.GA21844@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <20091018191247.GA21844@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Organization: Atmel X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.16.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 569 Lines: 15 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Haavard: The AVR32 assumption is pure on gcc's STACK_PUSH_CODE which is > POST_DEC. Could you please ack/nak it? Hmm, no, that is not correct. AVR32 is definitely pre-decrement. Note that 8-bit AVR and AVR32 are two completely different architectures. Haavard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/