Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750964AbZJSHpX (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:45:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750729AbZJSHpW (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:45:22 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55307 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750701AbZJSHpW (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:45:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:40:41 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Pavel Machek , david@lang.hm, Stefan Richter , linux-kernel Subject: Re: removing existing working drivers via staging Message-ID: <20091019074041.GA1796@suse.de> References: <4AD74ED7.9070501@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20091015164726.GA10125@suse.de> <20091017172743.GE1526@ucw.cz> <20091019073230.GD17960@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091019073230.GD17960@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2213 Lines: 52 On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 09:32:30AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Thu 2009-10-15 09:47:26, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 09:39:51AM -0700, david@lang.hm wrote: > > > > however, what I think I saw proposed was to move drivers that need to be > > > > 'cleaned up', to staging and then dropping them if they don't get cleaned. > > > > > > What is "proposed" is the following: > > > > > > - For drivers currently in the kernel tree, that the subsystem > > > maintainer, for whatever reason, feels is obsolete / broken / > > > needs major cleaning / wants to get rid of, can be submitted > > > to the staging maintainer to be moved to the drivers/staging/ > > > directory. > > > - For a file to be moved into this directory, all of the normal > > > staging rules apply, including most importantly, a TODO file > > > listing what needs to be done to the driver in order for it to > > > be moved back into the main portion of the kernel tree. > > > - If, after a period of 3 releases, no work has been done on the > > > driver by anyone, the driver will be removed from the staging > > > tree, just like all drivers in the staging tree. > > > > > > Note, as always, if a driver wants to come back from removal of the > > > staging tree, a simple email to the staging maintainer, along with the > > > promise that work will be done, is all it takes to resurrect it. > > > > > > Sound good? > > > > > > Now, where to put these "rules"? Any suggestions? > > > > I'm not sure it sounds good. It should not be named 'staging' at > > least. > > Why not? It's a good match - a driver gets staged because it's not fit > for upstream. > > The usual staging rules apply regardless of where the driver came from > (outside or inside the kernel): someone has to care about it and it has > to be fixed. Exactly, I'll keep the name for now, it's easier that way. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/