Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755530AbZJSH6W (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:58:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754004AbZJSH6W (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:58:22 -0400 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([85.10.199.196]:59086 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751538AbZJSH6V (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:58:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:58:25 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Haavard Skinnemoen Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] consider stack access while checking for alternate signal stack Message-ID: <20091019075824.GA25783@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> References: <20091018191247.GA21844@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> <20091019130931.6d8f0340@hskinnemoen-d830> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091019130931.6d8f0340@hskinnemoen-d830> X-Key-Id: FE3F4706 X-Key-Fingerprint: FFDA BBBB 3563 1B27 75C9 925B 98D5 5C1C FE3F 4706 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 700 Lines: 21 * Haavard Skinnemoen | 2009-10-19 13:09:31 [+0900]: >Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> Haavard: The AVR32 assumption is pure on gcc's STACK_PUSH_CODE which is >> POST_DEC. Could you please ack/nak it? > >Hmm, no, that is not correct. AVR32 is definitely pre-decrement. > >Note that 8-bit AVR and AVR32 are two completely different >architectures. Ah okay. So the AVR32 bits are not in upstream GCC yet? > >Haavard Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/