Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757394AbZJSTnH (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:43:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757257AbZJSTnG (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:43:06 -0400 Received: from fifo99.com ([67.223.236.141]:51866 "EHLO fifo99.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751824AbZJSTnF (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:43:05 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1]: fs: pipe.c null pointer dereference + sign off From: Daniel Walker To: Earl Chew Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4ADCAC33.4070908@agilent.com> References: <4AD8852E.2090302@agilent.com> <4ADCAC33.4070908@agilent.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:43:15 -0700 Message-Id: <1255981395.23353.46.camel@desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3626 Lines: 102 On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 11:13 -0700, Earl Chew wrote: > [ Exactly as before, but with sign off ] > You've got a few more submission related issues, see below. > This patch fixes a null pointer exception in pipe_rdwr_open() which > generates the stack trace: > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028 RIP: > > [] pipe_rdwr_open+0x35/0x70 > > [] __dentry_open+0x13c/0x230 > > [] do_filp_open+0x2d/0x40 > > [] do_sys_open+0x5a/0x100 > > [] sysenter_do_call+0x1b/0x67 > > This defect is also described in: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/14/184 > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14416 > > > The failure mode is triggered by an attempt to open an anonymous > pipe via /proc/pid/fd/* as exemplified by this script: > > ============================================================= > #!/bin/sh > while : ; do > { echo y ; sleep 1 ; } | { while read ; do echo z$REPLY; done ; } & > PID=$! > OUT=$(ps -efl | grep 'sleep 1' | grep -v grep | > { read PID REST ; echo $PID; } ) > OUT="${OUT%% *}" > DELAY=$((RANDOM * 1000 / 32768)) > usleep $((DELAY * 1000 + RANDOM % 1000 )) > echo n > /proc/$OUT/fd/1 # Trigger defect > done > ============================================================= > > Note that the failure window is quite small and I could only > reliably reproduce the defect by inserting a small delay > in pipe_rdwr_open(). For example: > > static int > pipe_rdwr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) > { > msleep(100); > mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex); > > > Although the defect was observed in pipe_rdwr_open(), I think it > makes sense to replicate the change through all the pipe_*_open() > functions. > > The core of the change is to verify that inode->i_pipe has not > been released before attempting to manipulate it. If inode->i_pipe > is no longer present, return ENOENT to indicate so. > > The comment about potentially using atomic_t for i_pipe->readers > and i_pipe->writers has also been removed because it is no longer > relevant in this context. The inode->i_mutex lock must be used so > that inode->i_pipe can be dealt with correctly. > > > Signed-off-by: Earl Chew > > > --- linux-2.6.21_mvlcge500/fs/pipe.c.orig 2009-10-15 > 20:33:53.000000000 -0700 > +++ linux-2.6.21_mvlcge500/fs/pipe.c 2009-10-15 21:21:25.000000000 -0700 > @@ -712,36 +712,55 @@ pipe_rdwr_release(struct inode *inode, s > static int You patch looks like it might be line wrapped .. Sometimes mailers will do that if you don't tell them the content is already formatted. Also I see your using a MontaVista kernel, which is older than current mainline .. I would assume you tested this on a recent kernel also? > pipe_read_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp) > { > - /* We could have perhaps used atomic_t, but this and friends > - below are the only places. So it doesn't seem worthwhile. */ > + int ret = -ENOENT; >From checkpatch, ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible #125: FILE: fs/pipe.c:720: + ret = 0;$ It looks like maybe your mailer (or copy and paste) may have stripped all the tabs off your patch. This makes is very difficult to apply. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/