Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757381AbZJSTsq (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:48:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757257AbZJSTsq (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:48:46 -0400 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.184]:20877 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751612AbZJSTsp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:48:45 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=N+S5vn2dRCnmhWx4+80rUkxtvdIy4i0ymgRK7ft6dS9riRfGDsP2nTFOaSWiJlugam cc6EL2Y9Ev2a9OtUtFYQnc6Eh/A/b9DzGQp5xrLbcmV0Ki21fYP+IRxtM9c2c4tiyNvj GpCONbQtaNZRLKneRbMdnCzrqKxmkTs+428Nc= Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:48:45 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Paul Mundt Cc: "K.Prasad" , Ingo Molnar , Alan Stern , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread breakpoints in flush_thread(). Message-ID: <20091019194842.GD4880@nowhere> References: <20091005102306.GA7889@linux-sh.org> <20091005104955.GA14852@in.ibm.com> <20091009034003.GA7747@linux-sh.org> <20091017234250.GC10344@nowhere> <20091018062558.GA20535@linux-sh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091018062558.GA20535@linux-sh.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 949 Lines: 23 On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 03:25:58PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > Thanks. If you're setting up a tree somewhere can you let me know where > it will be hosted? I'm pretty much done with the SH support for the > existing topic branch in -tip, but if it's being reworked, then I'd like > to get my changes reworked and integrated as soon as possible. Oh you have based SH breakpoint support on top of the current breakpoint API in -tip? Hm, you should have talked to us about that since it's being reworked. I'll probably post soon the rebase on top of perf events. And even if it gets merged in -tip, it should still be considered as very unstable. May be should you better wait for it to get upstream? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/