Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752951AbZJVA2x (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:28:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752346AbZJVA2x (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:28:53 -0400 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:35651 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751545AbZJVA2w (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:28:52 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:28:53 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: john stultz Cc: Andi Kleen , lkml , Mike Fulton , Sean Foley , Darren Hart Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add prctl to set sibling thread names Message-ID: <20091022002853.GP32470@one.firstfloor.org> References: <1256167297.4768.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1256167297.4768.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 18 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 04:21:37PM -0700, john stultz wrote: > > Taking a very raw attempt at this, I scratched out the following simple > implementation. I'd appreciate any review or suggestions for > improvements. I'm not at all certain the passing of the thread pid_t > through the unsigned long is valid, for instance, or if > same_thread_group() is the right check to make sure we only change > siblings and not tid from other processes. So any advice on better > approaches would be great. First though that comes to mind is that this should not be in prctl() -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/