Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755638AbZJVRnk (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:43:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755489AbZJVRnj (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:43:39 -0400 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:36313 "EHLO e39.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754862AbZJVRni (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:43:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:43:04 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Crane Cai , Bjorn Helgaas , lenb@kernel.org, linux-kernel , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c-scmi: Quirk to work on IBM machines with broken BIOSes Message-ID: <20091022174304.GO26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> Reply-To: djwong@us.ibm.com References: <20091020231149.GM26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091021023016.GC32413@crane-desktop> <200910210857.13978.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> <20091021173733.GN26149@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20091022071748.GA17917@crane-desktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091022071748.GA17917@crane-desktop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1255 Lines: 35 On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 03:17:53PM +0800, Crane Cai wrote: > This patch below represents my meanings: > *) add a new HID for IBM SMBus CMI devices > *) add methods for IBM SMBus CMI devices as you did > *) hook different HID with different control methods set > It may be more smooth for i2c-scmi, please consider. Looks fine to me. I still need the changes to drivers/acpi/scan.c, but if you push this patch upstream then I'll reroll my patch as a follow-on to yours... > static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_smbus_cmi_ids[] = { > - {"SMBUS01", 0}, > + {"SMBUS01", (kernel_ulong_t)&smbus_methods}, > + {"SMBUSIBM", (kernel_ulong_t)&ibm_smbus_methods}, ...with the custom HID string #define'd in a header file someplace. Actually, if you'll add a Signed-off-by line to your patch, I'll submit both of them as a patchset and save you a little work. :) > + for (; id->id[0]; id++) Stylistic nit--would it be clearer to initialize id in the for loop instead of at the beginning of the function? --D -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/