Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751431AbZJWHW4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:22:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751038AbZJWHW4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:22:56 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:48349 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751161AbZJWHWz (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:22:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:22:36 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Artem Bityutskiy Cc: Simon Kagstrom , David Woodhouse , Linus Torvalds , linux-mtd , Andrew Morton , LKML , "Koskinen Aaro (Nokia-D/Helsinki)" , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] core: Add kernel message dumper to call on oopses and panics Message-ID: <20091023072236.GA19169@elte.hu> References: <20091016080935.GA3895@elte.hu> <1255681467.32489.360.camel@localhost> <20091016112556.6902b2dc@marrow.netinsight.se> <20091016101045.GA3263@elte.hu> <20091016140918.3981cfa2@marrow.netinsight.se> <1255952922.32489.505.camel@localhost> <20091019125017.GA9030@elte.hu> <20091022082500.602f9a7d@marrow.netinsight.se> <1256193368.29856.466.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1256193368.29856.466.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1366 Lines: 40 * Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 08:25 +0200, Simon Kagstrom wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:33:11 +0900 (JST) > > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > > > > I wonder, via which tree this should go in. We are going to have mtdoops > > > > > depend on this. Should we go one of these ways: > > > > > > > > > > * this patch goes to one of Ingo's tip trees, so we can pull it and > > > > > work on top. > > > > > * we have Ingo's / Linus' acks, and this goes via the MTD tree. > > > > > ? > > > > > > > > Either way is good to me. Linus, do you have any preferences? > > > > > > Either works for me. > > > > I would put it all through Artems MTD tree then so that we keep the new > > API and the user of it close together then. > > > > Thanks to everyone for the reviewing and suggestions! > > > > It's dwmw2's tree actually. I just act as his secretary :-) > > David, could you push this patch to your tree? Ingo's and Linus' acks > are there, AFAIU. Yeah, the latest bits also have my: Acked-by: Ingo Molnar Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/