Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752474AbZJWVIS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:08:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752034AbZJWVIS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:08:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30347 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750756AbZJWVIR (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:08:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland McGrath To: Naohiro Ooiwa X-Fcc: ~/Mail/linus Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, oleg@redhat.com, LKML , h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com, Michael Kerrisk Subject: Re: [PATCH] show message when exceeded rlimit of pending signals In-Reply-To: Naohiro Ooiwa's message of Friday, 23 October 2009 19:07:06 +0900 <4AE1804A.2050404@miraclelinux.com> References: <4AE1804A.2050404@miraclelinux.com> Emacs: anything free is worth what you paid for it. Message-Id: <20091023210707.EDA87AFC4@magilla.sf.frob.com> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1622 Lines: 38 I have nothing in particular against the logging. (However, to me it seems a little odd to use system-wide logging for normal well-defined error cases of individual programs.) This seems to me primarily like a failure of documentation. If you'd asked me off hand what EAGAIN from timer_create could mean, I would have told you right off that you have too many timers or too many aggregate queued signals. I'm a person who would happen to know, of course. But also, if you look in POSIX.1 for the timer_create definition, under ERRORS it says: [EAGAIN] The system lacks sufficient signal queuing resources to honor the request. [EAGAIN] The calling process has already created all of the timers it is allowed by this implementation. Now that is a little vague about it potentially relating to the RLIMIT_SIGPENDING limit (which is not a POSIX.1 feature, though exactly the sort of thing permitted by the "is allowed by this implementation" clause). But it certainly points you in some reasonable directions so this doesn't seem like it would be such a mystery. But it's certainly unfortunate that man-pages-3.19 for timer_create has only: -EAGAIN The system could not process the request. That description is basically content-free, it applies equally to any potential error from any call. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/