Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753850AbZJYRmr (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:42:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753840AbZJYRmq (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:42:46 -0400 Received: from mondschein.lichtvoll.de ([194.150.191.11]:56543 "EHLO mail.lichtvoll.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753838AbZJYRmq (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:42:46 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 523 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 13:42:46 EDT From: Martin Steigerwald To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: udev in kernel source? Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:33:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.5-tp42-toi-3.0.1-04850-g4eddd0d; KDE/4.3.2; i686; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4644437.GuuxQE9nTG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910251834.06321.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2238 Lines: 61 --nextPart4644437.GuuxQE9nTG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! Would that qualify as a reason to put it there and have make-kpkg / make=20 deb / make rpm spit out a udev package as well? shambhala:/var/log> grep -i deprecated syslog | grep udev Oct 25 09:41:22 shambhala udevd[21078]: udev: missing sysfs features;=20 please update the kernel or disable the kernel's CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=20 option; udev may fail to work correctly = =20 Oct 25 09:41:37 shambhala kernel: <3>udev: missing sysfs features; please=20 update the kernel or disable the kernel's CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED option;=20 udev may fail to work correctly Oct 25 13:35:10 shambhala kernel: <3>udev: missing sysfs features; please=20 update the kernel or disable the kernel's CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED option;=20 udev may fail to work correctly It seems that nothing critical is not working, but I only found this by=20 closely watching the boot process at all. Granted, for a long time I did not see any udev/kernel version mismatch or= =20 configuration option mismatch issues, but back in udev early days I were=20 hit several times by those annoyances. Ironically I was about to disable CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED when it was=20 introduced, but then HAL didn't work. There should be an easy way to figure out whether kernel and deeply related= =20 userspace tools are matching each other. Ciao, =2D-=20 Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 --nextPart4644437.GuuxQE9nTG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkrkjAMACgkQmRvqrKWZhMdbDwCePiGXMXNarOCLmREjc2GsqcxM xpIAn2RLzEl0DINRGJFXlnUXm/sKvBes =+It9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4644437.GuuxQE9nTG-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/