Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755244AbZJZIKX (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:10:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755196AbZJZIKW (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:10:22 -0400 Received: from mail-gx0-f216.google.com ([209.85.217.216]:44928 "EHLO mail-gx0-f216.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755190AbZJZIKV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:10:21 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QSCZksnwcBLK5p+joaS9hI7QHlmSye90ZrP2Fl2s0tHhBmQTLpxxdnrLuLsqE/AkI9 Tw5adtwn5Hga17xNMrz7oLGnlwnJEypx6qx91qiVFKOZy2S2i6QTMY2mn7UDkNZQXdp0 ITIqp/g0ct61x+qXHB/gybd2WtLNW5t5XCxAE= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20091026073048.GC8162@elte.hu> References: <20091023160257.GA30447@Krystal> <20091023160632.GA2198@Krystal> <20091026015357.GA6033@localhost> <023001ca55e1$436e38e0$808410ac@zhaoleiwin> <49b7c2350910252203o69811000w4551c01e6e2a10c7@mail.gmail.com> <20091026073048.GC8162@elte.hu> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:10:26 +0900 Message-ID: <49b7c2350910260110l47d76cc5s35e87ca9082a9fa1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Relicensing tracepoints and markers to Dual LGPL v2.1/GPL v2,headers to Dual BSD/GPL From: GeunSik Lim To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Zhaolei , Wu Fengguang , Jesper Juhl , Mathieu Desnoyers , Adrian Bunk , Harvey Harrison , "Robert P. J. Day" , Jaswinder Singh Rajput , Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , Lai Jiangshan , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dominique Toupin , Michel Dagenais , Pierre-Marc Fournier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1515 Lines: 36 On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Yes, the legality of such relicensing is questionable as that code was > never developed outside of the kernel but as part of the kernel. > > But i also disagree with it on a technical level: code duplication is > _bad_. Why does the code have to be duplicated in user-space like that? > I'd like Linux tracing code to be in the kernel repo. Why isnt this done > properly, as part of the kernel project - to make sure it all stays in > sync? It's right. I am not a special lawyer about license issues currently. But, Consider GPL v2 license with philosophical view. I think that this re-licensing have a some problems in Linux kernel(GPL v2) at least. > So for those two grounds i cannot give my permission for this > relicensing, sorry. I agree with your opinion. >        Ingo > -- Regards, GeunSik Lim ( Samsung Electronics ) Blog : http://blog.naver.com/invain/ e-Mail: geunsik.lim@samsung.com leemgs@gmail.com , leemgs1@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/