Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753902AbZJZRBS (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753824AbZJZRBQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:16 -0400 Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:43163 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753406AbZJZRBP (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:01:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:55:19 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] strip: move driver to staging Message-ID: <20091026165518.GE2792@tuxdriver.com> References: <1256015830-12700-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> <20091023161006.GA1580@ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091023161006.GA1580@ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1963 Lines: 47 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 06:10:06PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Tue 2009-10-20 14:17:07, John W. Linville wrote: > > Move the strip ("Starmode Radio IP") driver to drivers/staging. For > > several years this driver has only seen API "bombing-run" changes, and > > few people ever had the hardware. This driver represents unnecessary > > ongoing maintenance for no clear benefit. > > This seems like abuse of the staging process. My mailbox has been filling-up with discussions of using staging like this for the past few weeks. I'm reasonably certain those threads were on the public lists. > There's no TODO to say what needs to be fixed. You just don't want to > maintain it. Because there's nothing to fix, noone has reason to patch > it, and the (working, good enough) driver will just be removed. "ongoing maintenance for no clear benefit" -- that is what is wrong with it. > It also marks driver as broken when it is not... I didn't mark it broken, I proposed moving it to staging. As for whether or not it actually is broken, how do you know? The drivers in this thread are for pre-802.11 devices -- old ones (e.g. ISA) at that. If we actually have users that are willing to maintain them then maybe that is fine. But I don't see the benefit of maintaining these simply as extra targets for API change "bombing runs"... > What about removing it in the regular way, that's > Documentation/feature-removal.txt ? This has been discussed recently as an alternative for unmaintained drivers. I suspect this is better than adding a note to a file that no one reads... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/