Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:43:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:43:12 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:39952 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:42:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 19:42:54 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Boris Bezlaj Cc: kernel-janitor-discuss , linux-kernel Subject: Re: mdacon.c minor cleanups Message-ID: <20020324194254.A14465@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Boris Bezlaj , kernel-janitor-discuss , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: <20020323164220.742414d2.boris@kista.gajba.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 04:42:20PM +0100, Boris Bezlaj wrote: > if (! mda_detect()) { > - printk("mdacon: MDA card not detected.\n"); > + printk(KERN_WARNING __FILE__ ": MDA card not detected.\n"); > return NULL; Does __FILE__ suffer the same 'deprecated' warning that newer gcc 3's spit out for __FUNCTION__ ? If so, it'd be better to do this properly than to add more bits that will just create another janitor item for someone else later.. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/