Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755378AbZJ0APS (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:15:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754958AbZJ0APR (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:15:17 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:47010 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754804AbZJ0APQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:15:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20091026.171539.06989895.davem@davemloft.net> To: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nico@fluxnic.net, tony.luck@intel.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, mcgrof@gmail.com, jeff@garzik.org, robert.richter@amd.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, khali@linux-fr.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC] to rebase or not to rebase on linux-next From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1256601061.26028.350.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> References: <1256599588.26028.340.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20091026.163050.156983266.davem@davemloft.net> <1256601061.26028.350.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1548 Lines: 44 From: Steven Rostedt Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:51:01 -0400 > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 16:30 -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: Steven Rostedt >> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:26:28 -0400 >> >> > I think this is more of a failure in git than in the work flow we >> > present. >> >> Others (like me) will say you should have let that patch cook for a >> while on the mailing list or in your tree before publishing, in order >> to let those acks and tested-by replies come in. >> >> That's how I handle this. >> >> And I really don't buy the argument that you have to publish the >> change in a GIT tree to get those ACKs and tested-by replies. > > The thing is, I do my changes with git. So do I. > I get something working and then commit it. Then I do more changes > and commit that. I don't use quilt anymore for this. And you can do this all day long if you like. What you can't do is _PUBLISH_ this anywhere to a tree that people also do development against _UNTIL_ you get those acks and tested-by tags back from people. Once your acks etc. come in, you can pop all of those pending patches out of your tree, add the ack tags to the commit messages, then reapply them. Then you can push to your public tree, but no sooner. It really is that simple. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/