Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756502AbZJ0HBr (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:01:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755459AbZJ0HBq (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:01:46 -0400 Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:53566 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755172AbZJ0HBp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:01:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Adjust softirq raising in __napi_schedule From: Johannes Berg To: Tilman Schmidt Cc: Jarek Poplawski , David Miller , hidave.darkstar@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, Michael Buesch , Oliver Hartkopp In-Reply-To: <4AE64441.7060008@imap.cc> References: <4AD76184.6030900@gmail.com> <4ADF5710.4030505@imap.cc> <20091021211906.GA11401@ami.dom.local> <1256160330.12174.2.camel@johannes.local> <20091021213947.GA12202@ami.dom.local> <1256200021.12174.11.camel@johannes.local> <4AE1C00B.5010008@imap.cc> <1256309191.12174.51.camel@johannes.local> <20091026074126.GA6187@ff.dom.local> <1256543054.28230.6.camel@johannes.local> <20091026075438.GB6187@ff.dom.local> <1256543932.28230.9.camel@johannes.local> <4AE56217.3040708@imap.cc> <1256547380.28230.17.camel@johannes.local> <4AE64441.7060008@imap.cc> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6ch9KbQaLIJxH1wlGqDK" Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:01:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1256626900.4237.2.camel@johannes.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3018 Lines: 70 --=-6ch9KbQaLIJxH1wlGqDK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 01:52 +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > > Any code (say ISDN code) that calls netif_rx() is clearly assuming to > > always be running in (soft)irq context, otherwise it couldn't call > > netif_rx() unconditionally. Agree so far? >=20 > Well, in fact I'm not sure. :-) All I know is that in the ISDN case, no > such assumption is explicitly stated anywhere. (The code in question is > called from the rcvcallb_skb() callback method which the hardware driver > calls when data has been received, and the description of that method in > Documentation/isdn/INTERFACE does not say anything about the context in > which it may be called.) The relevant code in drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_ppp.c > is rather old, perhaps even older than softirqs and the netif_rx() / > netif_rx_ni() split. (Bear in mind that we are talking about the old > ISDN4Linux subsystem which initially didn't even make it into the 2.6 > series because it was considered obsolete.) It seems quite possible to me > that just no one ever thought about that question. Heh :) > > So now if you change the ISDN code to call netif_rx_ni(), you've change= d > > the assumption that the ISDN code makes -- that it is running in > > (soft)irq context. Therefore, you need to verify that this is actually = a > > correct change, which is what I tried to say. >=20 > Understood. However, the fact that the local_softirq_pending message is > appearing would seem to indicate that this assumption was wrong to > begin with, wouldn't it? I thought it only recently started appearing with a new driver or something, but I may have misunderstood you. Anyway, I think that sums up the issue from my POV. johannes --=-6ch9KbQaLIJxH1wlGqDK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABAgAGBQJK5prQAAoJEODzc/N7+QmauwkQANCskBVoH8XtWB1eCnIoVb6v tqkrME+6YSTmUicvRLv6Ci3jNWGmsnDF253/GUavqD8uZqWdKQnx3srkl6EbS8/t X/je+cnc/zTVaTcjGZUYkL3lofLBzlwaE3jRCf8oMVKFn/HhaNvs2eMKKr/ckeOW 9emANyTor5anZUsNJaLXIi1qgVibyE9VGLCElKN4cYvGftc6uRCrRU923g/wzgK6 k41wjmSFW0NN4s7KCcuai2szbNSf9vB9Sb4spc2zbOmSY9r+TIoPVGw/vpPKNomz IytG7O7kLOiLYBPCTeALBqWamZtOTNwG71EIEqSaTJE/GCz7CRs7QcL/OLJIQw/4 xWhf8Ln5tbUk2Nb1ZCzvNi5XUiqI3iC4ZC8Aym/CXarlQdCoDgqQJ0/M4Bo7k5Es CETP98YH0U6b2l7/N13Ys+j39DyeBrG/d4SUPE1J1ffPd60zZ18Yo36XNjf1Syfu aaWRFUSOyaqTNrWR0SlF3sajkzAtnp6ccmFXmX8q1J0rniEvtD/7GcQ5FfrOhZBY uGx58WiNHfMirxmnowkv/mvnVLLSfoo+6GWVMVgLOqnRZ8geukJwapK6k1xQtfGG oxMO0kJ6eNVRIQtp0/CNeU6q33qwp2aVRbzy1F4atlXNLMB2z7Gp6A3ykw8bE+nA SL62Vg5JKLA8w9d/7hz1 =NgnP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6ch9KbQaLIJxH1wlGqDK-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/