Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:24:39 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hyperthreading on 4 core CPU DECREASES performance???
Message-ID: <20091028222439.3e0be650@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <e86b7d350910281224i7e91a1ecp9f3d15d9c36f19cb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e86b7d350910281224i7e91a1ecp9f3d15d9c36f19cb@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1139
Lines: 31

> This is Ubuntu Hardy, 2.6.24 kernel. I tried the same with 2.6.31,
> with the same effect.
> 
> This article from Intel:
> 
> http://software.intel.com/sites/oss/pdfs/mclinux.pdf
> 
> It talks about intelligent handling of multiple cores as a done deal,
> but in my experience that did not actually occur.
> 
> I would like to know how can I make the scheduler to prefer to spread
> the tasks across physical cores as opposed to bundling two on one core
> and leaving some cores idle.

The scheduler will try and do balancing for packages and for HT. Make
sure your distribution is built with the SCHED_SMT and SCHED_MC options
enabled. Some of the non-enterprise distirbutions may well not have these
enabled.

For hand laying out threads see: man pthread_setaffinity_np

The win from HT depends a lot on the CPU and also the workload mix. In
some workloads it will decrease performance.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/