Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754942AbZJ2DK7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:10:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751635AbZJ2DK6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:10:58 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:41675 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750870AbZJ2DK5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:10:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6 v5] Kernel DLPAR Infrastructure From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Nathan Fontenot Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4AE8AF4D.4030403@austin.ibm.com> References: <4AE8ADCF.6090104@austin.ibm.com> <4AE8AF4D.4030403@austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:08:51 +1100 Message-ID: <1256785731.26770.38.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 10180 Lines: 432 On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 15:53 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote: > This patch provides the kernel DLPAR infrastructure in a new filed named > dlpar.c. The functionality provided is for acquiring and releasing a resource > from firmware and the parsing of information returned from the > ibm,configure-connector rtas call. Additionally this exports the pSeries > reconfiguration notifier chain so that it can be invoked when device tree > updates are made. > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot > --- Hi Nathan ! Finally I get to review this stuff :-) > +#define CFG_CONN_WORK_SIZE 4096 > +static char workarea[CFG_CONN_WORK_SIZE]; > +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(workarea_lock); So I'm not a huge fan of this workarea static. First a static is in effect a global name (as far as System.map etc... are concerned) so it would warrant a better name. Then, do we really want that 4K of BSS taken even on platforms that don't do dlpar ? Any reason why you don't just pop a free page with __get_free_page() inside of configure_connector() ? > +struct cc_workarea { > + u32 drc_index; > + u32 zero; > + u32 name_offset; > + u32 prop_length; > + u32 prop_offset; > +}; > + > +static struct property *parse_cc_property(char *workarea) > +{ > + struct property *prop; > + struct cc_workarea *ccwa; > + char *name; > + char *value; > + > + prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!prop) > + return NULL; > + > + ccwa = (struct cc_workarea *)workarea; > + name = workarea + ccwa->name_offset; > + prop->name = kzalloc(strlen(name) + 1, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!prop->name) { > + kfree(prop); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + strcpy(prop->name, name); > + > + prop->length = ccwa->prop_length; > + value = workarea + ccwa->prop_offset; > + prop->value = kzalloc(prop->length, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!prop->value) { > + kfree(prop->name); > + kfree(prop); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + memcpy(prop->value, value, prop->length); > + return prop; > +} > + > +static void free_property(struct property *prop) > +{ > + kfree(prop->name); > + kfree(prop->value); > + kfree(prop); > +} > + > +static struct device_node *parse_cc_node(char *work_area) > +{ const char* maybe ? > + struct device_node *dn; > + struct cc_workarea *ccwa; > + char *name; > + > + dn = kzalloc(sizeof(*dn), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!dn) > + return NULL; > + > + ccwa = (struct cc_workarea *)work_area; > + name = work_area + ccwa->name_offset; I'm wondering whether work_area should be a struct cc_workarea * in the first place with a char data[] at the end, but that would mean probably tweaking the offsets... no big deal, up to you. > + dn->full_name = kzalloc(strlen(name) + 1, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!dn->full_name) { > + kfree(dn); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + strcpy(dn->full_name, name); kstrdup ? .../... > +#define NEXT_SIBLING 1 > +#define NEXT_CHILD 2 > +#define NEXT_PROPERTY 3 > +#define PREV_PARENT 4 > +#define MORE_MEMORY 5 > +#define CALL_AGAIN -2 > +#define ERR_CFG_USE -9003 > + > +struct device_node *configure_connector(u32 drc_index) > +{ It's a global exported function, I'd rather you call it dlpar_configure_connector() > + struct device_node *dn; > + struct device_node *first_dn = NULL; > + struct device_node *last_dn = NULL; > + struct property *property; > + struct property *last_property = NULL; > + struct cc_workarea *ccwa; > + int cc_token; > + int rc; > + > + cc_token = rtas_token("ibm,configure-connector"); > + if (cc_token == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE) > + return NULL; > + > + spin_lock(&workarea_lock); > + > + ccwa = (struct cc_workarea *)&workarea[0]; > + ccwa->drc_index = drc_index; > + ccwa->zero = 0; Popping a free page with gfp (or just kmalloc'ing 4K) would avoid the need for the lock too. > + rc = rtas_call(cc_token, 2, 1, NULL, workarea, NULL); > + while (rc) { > + switch (rc) { > + case NEXT_SIBLING: > + dn = parse_cc_node(workarea); > + if (!dn) > + goto cc_error; > + > + dn->parent = last_dn->parent; > + last_dn->sibling = dn; > + last_dn = dn; > + break; > + > + case NEXT_CHILD: > + dn = parse_cc_node(workarea); > + if (!dn) > + goto cc_error; > + > + if (!first_dn) > + first_dn = dn; > + else { > + dn->parent = last_dn; > + if (last_dn) > + last_dn->child = dn; > + } > + > + last_dn = dn; > + break; > + > + case NEXT_PROPERTY: > + property = parse_cc_property(workarea); > + if (!property) > + goto cc_error; > + > + if (!last_dn->properties) > + last_dn->properties = property; > + else > + last_property->next = property; > + > + last_property = property; > + break; > + > + case PREV_PARENT: > + last_dn = last_dn->parent; > + break; > + > + case CALL_AGAIN: > + break; > + > + case MORE_MEMORY: > + case ERR_CFG_USE: > + default: > + printk(KERN_ERR "Unexpected Error (%d) " > + "returned from configure-connector\n", rc); > + goto cc_error; > + } > + > + rc = rtas_call(cc_token, 2, 1, NULL, workarea, NULL); > + } > + > + spin_unlock(&workarea_lock); > + return first_dn; > + > +cc_error: > + spin_unlock(&workarea_lock); > + > + if (first_dn) > + free_cc_nodes(first_dn); > + > + return NULL; > +} > + > +static struct device_node *derive_parent(const char *path) > +{ > + struct device_node *parent; > + char parent_path[128]; > + int parent_path_len; > + > + parent_path_len = strrchr(path, '/') - path + 1; > + strlcpy(parent_path, path, parent_path_len); > + > + parent = of_find_node_by_path(parent_path); > + > + return parent; > +} This ... > +static int add_one_node(struct device_node *dn) > +{ > + struct proc_dir_entry *ent; > + int rc; > + > + of_node_set_flag(dn, OF_DYNAMIC); > + kref_init(&dn->kref); > + dn->parent = derive_parent(dn->full_name); > + > + rc = blocking_notifier_call_chain(&pSeries_reconfig_chain, > + PSERIES_RECONFIG_ADD, dn); > + if (rc == NOTIFY_BAD) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to add device node %s\n", > + dn->full_name); > + return -ENOMEM; /* For now, safe to assume kmalloc failure */ > + } > + > + of_attach_node(dn); > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE > + ent = proc_mkdir(strrchr(dn->full_name, '/') + 1, dn->parent->pde); > + if (ent) > + proc_device_tree_add_node(dn, ent); > +#endif > + > + of_node_put(dn->parent); > + return 0; > +} ... and this ... > +int add_device_tree_nodes(struct device_node *dn) > +{ > + struct device_node *child = dn->child; > + struct device_node *sibling = dn->sibling; > + int rc; > + > + dn->child = NULL; > + dn->sibling = NULL; > + dn->parent = NULL; > + > + rc = add_one_node(dn); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + > + if (child) { > + rc = add_device_tree_nodes(child); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + } > + > + if (sibling) > + rc = add_device_tree_nodes(sibling); > + > + return rc; > +} ... and this ... > +static int remove_one_node(struct device_node *dn) > +{ > + struct device_node *parent = dn->parent; > + struct property *prop = dn->properties; > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE > + while (prop) { > + remove_proc_entry(prop->name, dn->pde); > + prop = prop->next; > + } > + > + if (dn->pde) > + remove_proc_entry(dn->pde->name, parent->pde); > +#endif > + > + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&pSeries_reconfig_chain, > + PSERIES_RECONFIG_REMOVE, dn); > + of_detach_node(dn); > + of_node_put(dn); /* Must decrement the refcount */ > + > + return 0; > +} ... and this ... > +static int _remove_device_tree_nodes(struct device_node *dn) > +{ > + int rc; > + > + if (dn->child) { > + rc = _remove_device_tree_nodes(dn->child); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + } > + > + if (dn->sibling) { > + rc = _remove_device_tree_nodes(dn->sibling); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + } > + > + rc = remove_one_node(dn); > + return rc; > +} ... repeat myself ... > +int remove_device_tree_nodes(struct device_node *dn) > +{ > + int rc; > + > + if (dn->child) { > + rc = _remove_device_tree_nodes(dn->child); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + } > + > + rc = remove_one_node(dn); > + return rc; > +} ... should probably all go to something like drivers/of/dynamic.c or at least for now arch/powerpc/kernel/of_dynamic.c along with everything related to dynamically adding and removing nodes. I see that potentially useful for more than just DLPAR (though DLPAR is the only user right now) and should also all be prefixed with of_* > +#define DR_ENTITY_SENSE 9003 > +#define DR_ENTITY_PRESENT 1 > +#define DR_ENTITY_UNUSABLE 2 > +#define ALLOCATION_STATE 9003 > +#define ALLOC_UNUSABLE 0 > +#define ALLOC_USABLE 1 > +#define ISOLATION_STATE 9001 > +#define ISOLATE 0 > +#define UNISOLATE 1 > + > +int acquire_drc(u32 drc_index) > +{ > + int dr_status, rc; > + > + rc = rtas_call(rtas_token("get-sensor-state"), 2, 2, &dr_status, > + DR_ENTITY_SENSE, drc_index); > + if (rc || dr_status != DR_ENTITY_UNUSABLE) > + return -1; > + > + rc = rtas_set_indicator(ALLOCATION_STATE, drc_index, ALLOC_USABLE); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + > + rc = rtas_set_indicator(ISOLATION_STATE, drc_index, UNISOLATE); > + if (rc) { > + rtas_set_indicator(ALLOCATION_STATE, drc_index, ALLOC_UNUSABLE); > + return rc; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +int release_drc(u32 drc_index) > +{ > + int dr_status, rc; > + > + rc = rtas_call(rtas_token("get-sensor-state"), 2, 2, &dr_status, > + DR_ENTITY_SENSE, drc_index); > + if (rc || dr_status != DR_ENTITY_PRESENT) > + return -1; > + > + rc = rtas_set_indicator(ISOLATION_STATE, drc_index, ISOLATE); > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + > + rc = rtas_set_indicator(ALLOCATION_STATE, drc_index, ALLOC_UNUSABLE); > + if (rc) { > + rtas_set_indicator(ISOLATION_STATE, drc_index, UNISOLATE); > + return rc; > + } > + > + return 0; > +} Both above should have a dlpar_* prefix > +static int pseries_dlpar_init(void) > +{ > + if (!machine_is(pseries)) > + return 0; > + > + return 0; > +} > +device_initcall(pseries_dlpar_init); What the point ? :-) Cheers Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/