Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754581AbZJ2OPb (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:15:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754394AbZJ2OPa (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:15:30 -0400 Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:28496 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754293AbZJ2OP1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:15:27 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=W9Bcq+VM6J/9YCyB9vRkEx2lg54yV4ta11jZTWmlbeL5T9s8rkjl2Xl4TffhMsFwwL ERTFDjWy4v27Pz2yURClcsma7WNJQPvFRZcv4S0CBlJAaymwxVGC0lEYJh74diQsLEVQ 9k8c9C0PZcY6pydWiq+q3LpLUNRjt9HQZUcLQ= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Pekka Enberg Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:14:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.5-96.fc12.x86_64; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: David Miller , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com References: <200910291212.41656.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com> <84144f020910290652n2e75827dk698b238b6bd1cbed@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84144f020910290652n2e75827dk698b238b6bd1cbed@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200910291514.40318.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1305 Lines: 40 Hi, On Thursday 29 October 2009 14:52:50 Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi Bart, > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > wrote: > >> I'm saying that you should work with John to have him send a revert or > >> whatever to me. > > > > This is your responsibility to deal with your downstream maintainers, > > not mine and since you have accepted John's patch I'm asking you to > > revert rt2800pci patch from your tree. > > So why don't you just send a patch to fix it up? I see you're doing "git revert a9b3a9f" done. Dave, if you have problems with executing the command locally I'll be happy to supply you with the patch. > lots of cleanups to the staging drivers, why not direct some of that > energy to the drivers/net/wireless ones? When did we start to apply "fix it yourself" rule instead of "submitter should fix it" one to the _new_ code.. rt2800 drivers have their maintainers and I would like to know what they are doing besides complaining about users and staging tree.. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/