Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754299AbZJ2Ofj (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:35:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753816AbZJ2Ofi (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:35:38 -0400 Received: from gv-out-0910.google.com ([216.239.58.187]:41130 "EHLO gv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753110AbZJ2Ofh (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:35:37 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=I/9sm1xWck/lIsCG3moXiIi2G75cVJ6Dni40hRuUCgCuEEUY5kvnNhx7AZYthO2PuB XlnrF8EPrWw1j0knD3fro+klK5X0pSIyb2T+b9RG12hqc/hrllkoyS+At152qvxAEmQN U70fyWFOOi2BN9QhbtB4Y3BSvdAy+XdRpD++Y= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: David Miller Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:34:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.5-96.fc12.x86_64; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com References: <200910291435.54203.bzolnier@gmail.com> <200910291513.54326.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091029.072001.153801635.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20091029.072001.153801635.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200910291534.50108.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1746 Lines: 40 On Thursday 29 October 2009 15:20:01 David Miller wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:13:54 +0100 > > > John has chosen to ignore my concerns and you are sending me back to him? > > That's exactly why I won't overreach his maintainership role, > because you're inability to interact with and work with the > wireless maintainer isn't my problem. > > In case you're concerned, I actually agree with John and others > on this issue, and disagree with your position. > > So even if I felt it legitimate to overreach John, I still wouldn't > make the change you are requesting in this case. Sorry but you are also wrong then and you are just in the way of progress. > Does it really eat you so hard when someone disagrees with you? > > That's not going to work in the long term Bart, if John disagrees with > you he's the maintainer of wireless and that's it. You're going to > have to learn to work with people, and not just automatically go to a > "higher power" as soon as someone disagrees with you. I'm not going to waste my time on stupid or hopeless things just because you or John like to call themselves "maintainers". If Red Hat or some other company wants to hire me and pay me for spinning inside networking bureaucracy than please contact me in private but as long as it is my own time I'll just do what I think makes sense on technical merits and not on who is the "maintainer" of this or that.. -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/