Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S312442AbSCYQEh>; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:04:37 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S312449AbSCYQE1>; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:04:27 -0500
Received: from mail8.cadvision.com ([207.228.64.93]:55823 "EHLO
	mail8.cadvision.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S312442AbSCYQEP>; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:04:15 -0500
Message-ID: <001b01c1d417$7ec599a0$0100007f@localdomain.wni.com.wirelessnetworksinc.com>
From: "Herman Oosthuysen" <Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com>
To: "LKML" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <200203251522.JAA62284@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
Subject: Re: SSSCA Hits the Senate
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 09:09:51 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

The obvious solution is to continue the way Richard Stallman envisaged:
***Distribute all code in source form only - no binary distributions.***

This way, the source files are protected under freedom of speech rules and
the originator of the work is safe.

It is then up to the user to do with the code what he/she wants.

I think that while many people think that Richard is paranoid, he actually
was far more prophetic than most people wants to give him credit for...

Cheers,
--
Herman Oosthuysen
Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com
Suite 300, #3016, 5th Ave NE,
Calgary, Alberta, T2A 6K4, Canada
Phone: (403) 569-5687, Fax: (403) 235-3965
----- Original Message -----
From: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
To: <pgallen@randomlogic.com>; KPLUG List <kplug-list@kernel-panic.org>;
KPLUG Newbie <kplug-newbie@kernel-panic.org>; KPLUG LPSG
<kplug-lpsg@kernel-panic.org>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: SSSCA Hits the Senate


>
> >
> > This is bad, very bad. If the bill passes as written, all software will
> > be subject to it. Senator Hollings and his cronies (and anyone who
> > thinks like them) need to get a clue. They need to be out of office.
> >
> > (My apologies in advance if this does not come across as text. My
> > regular system is broken and I'm forced to use Winsucks and Nutscrape
> > for my mail.)
> >
> > http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51274,00.html
> >
> > PGA
>
> Has there been anything that says the copy protection code can't be
source?
> If it were included in the source, along with all the other code, would
that
> be recognized as "protected"?
>
> It would also be impossible to include copy protection in a compiler..
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jesse I Pollard, II
> Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil
>
> Any opinions expressed are solely my own.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/