Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:25:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:25:31 -0500 Received: from [195.102.192.95] ([195.102.192.95]:34543 "EHLO keston.u-net.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:25:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:36:21 +0000 From: David Flynn To: Dieter =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel List , Matthias Andree , jonathan@woaf.net Subject: Re: Possible problems with D-LINK DFE-550TX (stock sundance driver) under 2.4.18 Message-ID: <20020325163621.GA21260@woaf.net> Mail-Followup-To: Dieter =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=FCtzel?= , Dave Jones , Linux Kernel List , Matthias Andree , jonathan@woaf.net In-Reply-To: <200203250336.08428.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> <20020325123942.A23014@suse.de> <200203251540.37393.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ Organisation: Poor X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.17 (i686) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Dieter N?tzel (Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de) wrote: > On Montag, 25. M?rz 2002 :39, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:36:07AM +0100, Dieter N?tzel wrote: > > > > Try booting with just one processor (maxcpus=1 boot option) or borrow > > > > two Athlon MP and see if you can reproduce the problem then. If you > > > > can, someone may help you. I you can't reproduce it with one CPU, > > > > you're probably on your own. > > > > > > On "newer" Athlon XP (Duron, Athlon Thoroughbred) L5-4 bridge have to be > > > closed. > > > > You don't for a minute think that there might be a reason that bridge > > got broken at the factory ? *sigh*, we've been through this topic > > before, I'm tired of arguing it. > > Sure, but some wise men said, "there is nothing that simple on this planet". > Some Athlon XP/MP are "broken", so they were labeled as XPs. > In the other case it's simple marketing and business (earning more money). > You can only argue about the distribution. But your are right, I won't do > that. I only want to be sure that David didn't have one of the old XPs. > > -Dieter > Please, do we have to go on about the merits of Athlon XP systems in MP configurations ?? 1) your wrong about the bridges, it only affects iirc the new XP2000+ chips, 2) is it /REALLY/ the issue ?? i do not think so. However, I am very happy to report that the system has just done it again. I can't give any further details yet, although i am just going over to pay a visit to the box and do some more investigations. FYI, we have two of these boxes with the same hardware / kernel configuration. Two of them have now shown the same problem (eth0 timeouts). Including having maxcpus=1 set. Could this perhaps be a driver issue after all ? Many Thanks Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/