Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S311834AbSCYRex>; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:34:53 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S311832AbSCYReo>; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:34:44 -0500
Received: from smtp.actcom.co.il ([192.114.47.13]:24716 "EHLO
	lmail.actcom.co.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S312470AbSCYRea>; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:34:30 -0500
Message-Id: <200203251734.g2PHYLq24629@lmail.actcom.co.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Itai Nahshon <nahshon@actcom.co.il>
Reply-To: nahshon@actcom.co.il
To: Jesse Pollard <pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>, pgallen@randomlogic.com,
        KPLUG List <kplug-list@kernel-panic.org>,
        KPLUG Newbie <kplug-newbie@kernel-panic.org>,
        KPLUG LPSG <kplug-lpsg@kernel-panic.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SSSCA Hits the Senate
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 19:34:08 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
In-Reply-To: <200203251522.JAA62284@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Monday 25 March 2002 17:22, Jesse Pollard wrote:
> Has there been anything that says the copy protection code can't be source?
> If it were included in the source, along with all the other code, would
> that be recognized as "protected"?

Worst thing happens if somebody gets a patent for the copy protection schemes...

-- Itai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/