Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:11:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:11:37 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com ([204.127.198.39]:33272 "EHLO rwcrmhc53.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 14:11:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 11:11:17 -0800 From: "H . J . Lu" To: Peter Hartley Cc: linux kernel , GNU C Library Subject: Re: Does e2fsprogs-1.26 work on mips? Message-ID: <20020325111117.A15661@lucon.org> In-Reply-To: <37D1208A1C9BD511855B00D0B772242C011C7F15@corpmail1.sc.sonicblue.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 11:00:05AM -0800, Peter Hartley wrote: > H J Lu wrote: > > What are you talking about? It doesn't matter which kernel header > > is used. glibc doesn't even use /usr/include/asm/resource.h nor > > should any user space applications. > > It's not about /usr/include/asm/resource.h, it's about > /usr/include/asm/unistd.h, where the syscall numbers are defined. > > This is presumably what the "#ifdef __NR_ugetrlimit" in > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/getrlimit.c is meant to be testing against -- > nothing in the glibc-2.2.5 distribution itself defines that symbol. Surely a > Linux glibc doesn't compile without the target system's linux/* and asm/* > headers? > > 2.4's /usr/include/asm/unistd.h defines __NR_ugetrlimit but 2.2's doesn't. > I see. I think glibc should either require 2.4 header files under and , or define __NR_ugetrlimit if it is not defined. H.J. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/