Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751948AbZKATUF (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:20:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751499AbZKATUD (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:20:03 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f202.google.com ([209.85.211.202]:42381 "EHLO mail-yw0-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbZKATUC (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Nov 2009 14:20:02 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=OutzwgF0zJx3grnTMDk8ktXTllCyoV37Wq/2KK1Q9OjdPdZBdrp7xR0l3mO9RVilAy 1SSjRcAkPXgG0+sjbuPRn7uOIjSJtXIjDjzrm06x8ZkEntOmYc66orob/JjWIr1Uv5PU gQW4qaXre0R7FNPWjLYM+xvKhkIcej6zYZql8= Subject: Re: FatELF patches... From: David Hagood To: "Ryan C. Gordon" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:20:01 -0600 Message-ID: <1257103201.2865.6.camel@chumley> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1251 Lines: 26 On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:19 -0400, Ryan C. Gordon wrote: > Having heard a bunch of commentary, and made a bunch of changes based on > some really good feedback, here are my hopefully-final FatELF patches. I hope it's not too late for a request for consideration: if we start having fat binaries, could one of the "binaries" be one of the "not quite compiled code" formats like Architecture Neutral Distribution Format (ANDF), such that, given a fat binary which does NOT support a given CPU, you could at least in theory process the ANDF section to create the needed target binary? Bonus points for being able to then append the newly created section to the file. That way you could have a binary that supported some "common" subset of CPUs (e.g. x86,x86-64,PPC,ARM) but still run on the "not common" processors (Alpha, MIPS, Sparc) - it would just take a bit more time to start. As an embedded systems guy who is looking to have to support multiple CPU types, this is really very interesting to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/