Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:53:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:52:56 -0500 Received: from mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.5.133]:48818 "EHLO mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:52:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:52:42 -0500 From: Matthew Drobnak Subject: More observations regarding IPv6 on PPC platform. To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <3C9FAA3A.8000701@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org While I was attempting to debug a little bit, I installed tcpdump to see if it was even seeing the router advertisements...Apparently it was.. On top of that, if you keep tcpdump running, IPv6 works fine! I noticed that when I had it manually configured, whenever any sort of routing was necessary, a neighbor solicitation was sent out, but never made it to the other end. However, if I let it auto configure, it worked fine, and as well if I added on the secondary addresss using "ifconfig eth1 add ....", so, with that being said, is it a MAC or IP address filtering problem? Any ideas would be appreciated, I'd like to get this running, as I'm a big fan of IPv6... I have 1 IPv4 address, but a whole /48 to work with. :-D Thanks again, -Matthew Drobnak - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/