Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754781AbZKBMUT (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:20:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754488AbZKBMUT (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:20:19 -0500 Received: from lvps87-230-0-242.dedicated.hosteurope.de ([87.230.0.242]:36165 "EHLO lvps87-230-0-242.dedicated.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754452AbZKBMUS (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:20:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:20:11 +0100 From: Michael Guntsche To: Frans Pop , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Page alloc problems with 2.6.32-rc kernels Message-ID: <20091102122010.GA5552@gibson.comsick.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 878 Lines: 23 Missed the CC's Good morning, > I have the server running with all with patches applied and it runs > without any issues. Since adding patch5 seems to make a difference I > will revert 1-4 and only apply patch 5 to see if it work too. I will > report back as soon as I have news. Current status of my tests here. With only patch 5 applied (the revert) I am not able to reproduce the problem. Reading through the ml archives I noticed that this revert is somewhat controversial since it seems to fix other bugs. Is it possible that reverting those fixes just hide the bug I am seeing instead of fixing it? Kind regards, Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/