Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 19:14:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 19:14:28 -0500 Received: from vasquez.zip.com.au ([203.12.97.41]:18446 "EHLO vasquez.zip.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 19:14:10 -0500 Message-ID: <3C9FBCDA.C898E977@zip.com.au> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:12:10 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcelo Tosatti CC: Rusty Russell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] smaller kernels In-Reply-To: <20020325165605.7d9c1d6e.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > I've just readded all asserts which you removed... if you really want to > remove any of those, please prove me that they are useless. I grepped a year's lkml traffic - nobody is hitting any of them... The quotaops.h checks were useless: if (pointer == NULL) BUG(); dereference(pointer); The others can become calls to out_of_line_bug() if you want. That's dget(), unhash_process(), memclear_highpage_flush(), __skb_pull() and tcp_prequeue() - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/