Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:10:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:10:00 -0500 Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com ([216.148.227.87]:32908 "EHLO rwcrmhc54.attbi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:09:43 -0500 From: "Ashok Raj" To: "Ashok Raj" , Subject: RE: version.h missing from 2.4.18? Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 02:09:23 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dont bother... i looked at the Makefile and saw this is autogenerated now. ashokr -----Original Message----- From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Ashok Raj Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:45 PM To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: version.h missing from 2.4.18? Hello. Its been a while i spent working with newer kernels. Looking at the tree now noticed that 2.4.18 etc dont have a include/linux/version.h file? has its need removed? or does it have an alternate home? I have see that up until 2.4.9+ we had this and also still notice in redhat releases? thanks ashokr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/