Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:15:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:14:50 -0500 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:4550 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 05:14:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 11:14:24 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: Alan Cox Cc: Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [Announcement] patch-2.0.40-rc4 Message-ID: <20020326111424.A16636@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20020317135322.J3301@khan.acc.umu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 05:24:57PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > o Commented out a printk in fs/buffer.c (Michael Deutschmann) > > that complains about mismatching > > blocksizes > > Erm.. why ?? It seems to be correctly complaining for a reason According to Michael Deutschmann, who still uses v2.0 actively (and gets this message a lot), the code seems to do the right thing despite the complaint; hence the message seemed unnecessary. Regards: David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Maintainer of the v2.0 kernel // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/