Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755104AbZKCVLI (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:11:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754874AbZKCVLH (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:11:07 -0500 Received: from mail.crca.org.au ([67.207.131.56]:43142 "EHLO crca.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754731AbZKCVLG (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:11:06 -0500 X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Message-ID: <4AF09CB2.9030500@crca.org.au> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:12:18 +1100 From: Nigel Cunningham User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: KOSAKI Motohiro , LKML , Rik van Riel , linux-mm , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/5] vmscan: Kill hibernation specific reclaim logic and unify it References: <20091102000855.F404.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091103002520.886C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <4AEF4CF1.3020500@crca.org.au> <200911031230.20344.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200911031230.20344.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1893 Lines: 45 Hi Rafael. Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 02 November 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote: >> Hi. > > Hi, > >> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >>>> I haven't given much thought to numa awareness in hibernate code, but I >>>> can say that the shrink_all_memory interface is woefully inadequate as >>>> far as zone awareness goes. Since lowmem needs to be atomically restored >>>> before we can restore highmem, we really need to be able to ask for a >>>> particular number of pages of a particular zone type to be freed. >>> Honestly, I am not suspend/hibernation expert. Can I ask why caller need to know >>> per-zone number of freed pages information? if hibernation don't need highmem. >>> following incremental patch prevent highmem reclaim perfectly. Is it enough? >> (Disclaimer: I don't think about highmem a lot any more, and might have >> forgotten some of the details, or swsusp's algorithms might have >> changed. Rafael might need to correct some of this...) >> >> Imagine that you have a system with 1000 pages of lowmem and 5000 pages >> of highmem. Of these, 950 lowmem pages are in use and 500 highmem pages >> are in use. >> >> In order to to be able to save an image, we need to be able to do an >> atomic copy of those lowmem pages. >> >> You might think that we could just copy everything into the spare >> highmem pages, but we can't because mapping and unmapping the highmem >> pages as we copy the data will leave us with an inconsistent copy. > > This isn't the case any more for the mainline hibernate code. We use highmem > for storing image data as well as lowmem. Highmem for storing copies of lowmem pages? Regards, Nigel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/