Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755566AbZKDLgI (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:36:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755552AbZKDLgH (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:36:07 -0500 Received: from mx1.moondrake.net ([212.85.150.166]:33897 "EHLO mx1.mandriva.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755528AbZKDLgG (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:36:06 -0500 X-Spam-Virus: No From: Arnaud Patard To: wuzhangjin@gmail.com Cc: Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, LKML , huhb@lemote.com, yanh@lemote.com, Zhang Le , Thomas Gleixner , Nicholas Mc Guire , zhangfx@lemote.com, liujl@lemote.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -queue v0 1/6] [loongson] add basic loongson-2f support References: <1257332652.8716.5.camel@falcon.domain.org> Organization: Mandriva Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:36:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1257332652.8716.5.camel@falcon.domain.org> (Wu Zhangjin's message of "Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:04:12 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1452 Lines: 40 Wu Zhangjin writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 11:28 +0100, Arnaud Patard wrote: > [...] >> > + >> > +config CPU_LOONGSON2F >> > + bool "Loongson 2F" >> > + depends on SYS_HAS_CPU_LOONGSON2F >> > + select CPU_LOONGSON2 >> > + help >> > + The Loongson 2F processor implements the MIPS III instruction set >> > + with many extensions. >> > + >> > + Loongson2F have built-in DDR2 and PCIX controller. The PCIX controller >> > + have a similar programming interface with FPGA northbridge used in >> > + Loongson2E. >> > + >> >> Small question : Why don't you restrict to 64bit kernels only ? From >> what I remember from some discussions with ST, trying to use a 32-bit >> kernel on 2f is a nice way to get troubles. It would be better imho to >> forbid such a configuration. As a side effect, this will remove all >> 'defined(CONFIG_64BIT)' parts of your #ifdef tests. >> > > It's hard to make such a decision ;) Perhaps some guys want to play with > the 32bit version. It's a matter of taste : using 32 bit and getting an more or less broken machine or using 64bit and getting a working machine. I don't think a lot of people will choose the first option :) Arnaud -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/