Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756203AbZKDN2I (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:28:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756142AbZKDN2H (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:28:07 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:43263 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756181AbZKDN2G (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:28:06 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:28:10 +0100 (CET) From: Jiri Kosina X-X-Sender: jkosina@wotan.suse.de To: Felipe Contreras Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , Bjorn Helgaas , Myron Stowe , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] acpi: processor: fix section mismatch In-Reply-To: <1255906474-25091-5-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1255906474-25091-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1255906474-25091-5-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1363 Lines: 40 On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Felipe Contreras wrote: > WARNING: drivers/acpi/processor.o(.text+0x99a): Section mismatch in > reference from the function acpi_processor_add() to the function > .cpuinit.text:acpi_processor_power_init() > > acpi_processor_add replaced acpi_processor_start which had __cpuinit. > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras > --- > drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c > index c567b46..ec742a4 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c > @@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ static struct notifier_block acpi_cpu_notifier = > .notifier_call = acpi_cpu_soft_notify, > }; > > -static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device) > +static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device) > { > struct acpi_processor *pr = NULL; > int result = 0; I don't see this patch in today's linux-next ... ACPI guys, are you going to merge it? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/