Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756985AbZKDQCY (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:02:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756955AbZKDQCT (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:02:19 -0500 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.27]:61975 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756949AbZKDQCR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:02:17 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; b=dXk2oHdYARrB/58s8Oz8YS3JRCSlvd6tVzkbC6kunJmFFS8t1JdFOZGfySb+ZHfNcd 6/K2A/sndoSg/o3GFJTEc+ltieeH2r7UVOJ7afGiLXRg0z0dEPuh9d9i0s7mC+oWUlhu XJQ16dDgQDtJt/xcYzfYDCxpL/2st/QNcVJ8Y= Message-ID: <4AF1A587.8000509@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:02:15 -0500 From: Gregory Haskins User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, Rusty Russell , s.hetze@linux-ag.com, Daniel Walker , Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/3] vhost: a kernel-level virtio server References: <20091104155234.GA32673@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20091104155234.GA32673@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9CBB576151305611F6CF6CC2" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1685 Lines: 52 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9CBB576151305611F6CF6CC2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Ok, I think I've addressed all comments so far here. > Rusty, I'd like this to go into linux-next, through your tree, and > hopefully 2.6.33. What do you think? I think the benchmark data is a prerequisite for merge consideration, IMO= =2E Do you have anything for us to look at? I think comparison that show the following are of interest: throughput (e.g. netperf::TCP_STREAM): guest->host, guest->host->guest, guest->host->remote, host->remote, remote->host->guest latency (e.g. netperf::UDP_RR): same conditions as throughput cpu-utilization others? Ideally, this should be at least between upstream virtio and vhost. Bonus points if you include venet as well. Kind regards, -Greg --------------enig9CBB576151305611F6CF6CC2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrxpYcACgkQP5K2CMvXmqHHKQCfX0c8WoojuJe1A+eFFzu9twpU PEkAn2bUMmeK9n8AfgWItG+bCqzjqtDQ =6kXy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9CBB576151305611F6CF6CC2-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/