Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756999AbZKDQFb (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:05:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756887AbZKDQFa (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:05:30 -0500 Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.6]:47618 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756839AbZKDQFa (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:05:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:35:30 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: Jan Safranek Cc: Dave Hansen , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Dhaval Giani , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Bharata B Rao , libcg-devel , "menage@google.com" Subject: Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup Message-ID: <20091104160530.GI3560@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20091104063005.GC3560@balbir.in.ibm.com> <20091104154024.0b8f6123.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091104081618.GD3560@balbir.in.ibm.com> <1257348117.31972.4360.camel@nimitz> <4AF1A58E.1020003@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF1A58E.1020003@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1069 Lines: 27 * Jan Safranek [2009-11-04 17:02:22]: > On 11/04/2009 04:21 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > >On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 13:46 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > >>The reason I liked /dev/cgroup was because cpusets could be > >>mounted at /dev/cpuset or /dev/cgroup/cpuset. My concern with /cgroup > >>is that a ls "/" now becomes larger in size. But I'll take your vote > >>for it as +1 for /cgroup. > > > >/dev/pts is a decent precedent for doing it under /dev, although it does > >deal with actual devices. cgroups do not. > > There is also /dev/shm, but IMHO that's not reason to pollute /dev > with filesystems that are not devices. > Yep, but hasn't the pollution already occured with /dev/cpuset today? sysfs would require work for changes to /sys, so do we go with Kame's suggestion of /cgroup? -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/