Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754037AbZKDSvL (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:51:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751614AbZKDSvK (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:51:10 -0500 Received: from outbound-mail-136.bluehost.com ([67.222.39.26]:48071 "HELO outbound-mail-136.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750848AbZKDSvJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:51:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=pOvdt9NbP4Fdz/FMwCF+iFXzuPnb0A9RKJaNdw12oZliN9NNAHjMbydXyoZJ3MB32YGjMRXGlN8Z7DgsBzifpc3ovUqRjl36RYL63iZZ5qLtw98vv7Scn+zO8M95H5jK; Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:51:12 -0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Andrew Morton , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] resources: when allocate_resource() fails, leave resource untouched Message-ID: <20091104105112.4cf5233e@jbarnes-piketon> In-Reply-To: References: <20091102174536.12512.56685.stgit@bob.kio> <20091104102026.5698a9b4@jbarnes-piketon> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.18.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.28.251 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 980 Lines: 29 On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:29:54 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > Seems like a reasonable change to me. Linus is usually the > > gatekeeper for resource.c. > > I'm certainly ok with this one. I wouldn't be surprised if it even > allows for better code generation, apart from leaving resources > untouched when allocation fails. So: > > Acked-by: Linus Torvalds > > It was apparently sent to Andrew, but I can certainly take it. Or you > can take it into the PCI tree. Or we can leave it in -mm. Anything > goes. Just tell me. Ok, I'll pick it up. Thanks. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/