Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933142AbZKDXpT (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:45:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932752AbZKDXpS (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:45:18 -0500 Received: from imap.ru.mvista.com ([213.79.90.228]:11312 "EHLO buildserver.ru.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932635AbZKDXpR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:45:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 02:45:19 +0300 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Paul Fertser Cc: Pavel Machek , Anton Vorontsov , David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] power: pcf50633: properly reenable charging when the supply conditions change Message-ID: <20091104234519.GA4587@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com References: <1257369899-325-1-git-send-email-fercerpav@gmail.com> <1257369899-325-2-git-send-email-fercerpav@gmail.com> <1257369899-325-3-git-send-email-fercerpav@gmail.com> <1257369899-325-4-git-send-email-fercerpav@gmail.com> <1257369899-325-5-git-send-email-fercerpav@gmail.com> <20091104214622.GA27325@elf.ucw.cz> <20091104222431.GB24196@home.pavel.comp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091104222431.GB24196@home.pavel.comp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1339 Lines: 35 On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 01:24:31AM +0300, Paul Fertser wrote: [...] > > If you want to "top-up" the battery, perhaps that should be on > > explicit request, like something in /sys? > > Well, probably but to me it seems like an unnecessary complexity. Also > since Li* batteries are dominating the market nowadays this > functionality would need to be introduced in the power_supply core to > provide userspace with a consistent interface. Anton, can you please > comment on this? Power supply class doesn't have writeable properties (initially it was a 'battery monitor class'). Though. I'd happily merge the support for writeable properties. ACPI batteries would benefit too, i.e. they could export 'alarm' property (see drivers/acpi/battery.c). Though, I'd want to apply this patch set as is (i.e. I prefer the new behaviour, as it's really more 'user friendly'), and we could implement configurable option later. Pavel do you have a strong objection against this patch, or you can live with it? :-) Thanks! -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/