Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754611AbZKEFgw (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:36:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754492AbZKEFgw (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:36:52 -0500 Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.149]:60313 "EHLO e31.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751427AbZKEFgv (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:36:51 -0500 Message-ID: <4AF26471.6010705@us.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:36:49 -0800 From: Darren Hart User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: KOSAKI Motohiro CC: Andrew Morton , john stultz , Arjan van de Ven , Andi Kleen , lkml , Mike Fulton , Sean Foley Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Add prctl to set sibling thread names References: <20091105112303.208A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <4AF25FFB.5020700@us.ibm.com> <20091105141953.2090.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20091105141953.2090.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1283 Lines: 35 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> >>> John, I'd prefer to suggested another design. >>> How about this? >>> >>> 1. remove pid argument from prctl >>> 2. cancel pthread_setname_np() >>> 3. instead, create pthread_attr_setname_np() >>> 4. pthread_create() change own thread name by pthread_attr. >>> >>> It avoid many racy problem automatically. >> Perhaps, but it also greatly reduces the flexibility of the >> implementation by restricting name changes to create time. > > Hm. > if your program really need to change another thread name, can you please tell us > why it is necessary and when it is used? > I think John's previous mails covered that pretty well. As for doing the name change at create time, or sometime later, it just seems to me that the flexibility of doing so later is worth having. While I know we don't have to follow other systems implementations, in this case pthread_setname_np() seems a reasonable model to follow to me. -- Darren Hart IBM Linux Technology Center Real-Time Linux Team -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/