Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:30:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:30:40 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:55562 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 18:30:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [2.4.18] Security: Process-Killer if machine get's out of memory To: dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org (dean gaudet) Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:47:04 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), andihartmann@freenet.de (Andreas Hartmann), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Kernel-Mailingliste) In-Reply-To: from "dean gaudet" at Mar 26, 2002 12:24:58 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > what's the point if you're just going to get signal delivery when you > least want it, even when malloc returns non-NULL? it could even be due to If you are running with no overcommit you'll always (for any statistically interesting case get the malloc NULL and no signals) > it's guaranteed to work in all cases. (hence, apache-1.3 and other > multiprocess daemon superiority over threaded and event-driven code, tee > hee :) thttpd -> 1000 hits/second on a 32Mb pentium I don't hear you 8) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/