Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758804AbZKEToj (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:44:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758613AbZKEToj (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:44:39 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:38268 "EHLO mail-bw0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758592AbZKEToi (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:44:38 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KMCVH/TozUkEzlWGzxeAs+J8J9vlgM9nuNKUdh+O/x/4cROBvhI7Va7LtrKnloHLXW xwsAZjdpjho7zkBtf7bDCBdKK4Q2kDWk+5tZBXGEA9GQxfg8ZsCvjUJMfmblJLECqp8n j/zgPcux5GXTEVUGKdLxnzwCajIY2yQSkG+WU= Message-ID: <4AF32B25.4000700@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:44:37 -0500 From: William Allen Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Dumazet CC: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Linux Kernel Developers , Linux Kernel Network Developers Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH RFC] TCPCT part 1d: generate Responder Cookie References: <4AEAC763.4070200@gmail.com> <4AED86AD.6010906@gmail.com> <4AEDCD7C.2010403@gmail.com> <4AF0B0D2.4030905@gmail.com> <20091104214844.GA6714@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4AF2C266.1010603@gmail.com> <4AF2D0E0.1040903@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4AF2D0E0.1040903@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 932 Lines: 22 Eric Dumazet wrote: > William Allen Simpson a ?crit : >> As you suggest, I'll use the _bh suffix everywhere until every i is dotted >> and t is crossed. Then, check for efficiency later after thorough >> analysis by experts such as yourself. >> >> This code will be hit on every SYN and SYNACK that has a cookie option. >> But it's just prior to a CPU intensive sha_transform -- in comparison, >> it's trivial. >> > I think you misunderstood my advice ;) > Yes, I misunderstood, but it's clear now. As I have to re-spin the whole kit and kaboodle after the recent net-next crashing bug fixes, I'll post another complete set tomorrow to the net list. Thanks again (for all messages). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/