Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753431AbZKFHcL (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:32:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752887AbZKFHcK (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:32:10 -0500 Received: from e23smtp01.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.143]:38880 "EHLO e23smtp01.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752639AbZKFHcJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:32:09 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:02:08 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: Jan Safranek Cc: Daniel Lezcano , libcg-devel , "menage@google.com" , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, Bharata B Rao , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Dhaval Giani Subject: Re: [RFC] Mount point suggestions for cgroup Message-ID: <20091106073208.GA4992@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20091104063005.GC3560@balbir.in.ibm.com> <4AF1AF68.40704@free.fr> <4AF2C000.3020807@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF2C000.3020807@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1942 Lines: 53 * Jan Safranek [2009-11-05 13:07:28]: > On 11/04/2009 05:44 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >Balbir Singh wrote: > >>Hi, All, > >> > >>We've been having a discussion as to what would be the right place to > >>mount the cgroup filesystem. Jan has been proactively looking into > >>this. The FHS has no recommendation since cgroup filesystem came in > >>much later. > >> > >>The options are > >> > >>1. /dev/cgroup > >>2. /cgroup > >>3. Some place under /sys > >> > >>The problem with (2) is that it is quite non-standard and pollutes the > >>root directory. (3) requires some basic support to create a directory > >>for cgroup under /sys. (1) seems the most obvious choice since cpusets > >>were mounted under /dev/cpuset, but /dev is controlled by udev. > >> > >>Given the three choices or any other suggestions, is there a general > >>preference as to where we can mount it? The goal is to standardize > >>the mount point (if possible). > >Why the mount point has to be standardized ? > > > > The mount point does not need to be set into stone so everybody > *must* use it. I, as Fedora packager, just need some default place > where to mount it, so applications which need to create/manage > groups work without any (potentially dumb) user assistance. I see no consensus, there are different approaches people like. I wonder if we can create an empty directory under /sys/kernel/cgroup, if so we would have supported the /sys approach. I'll send out a patch to do the same. Of > course, advanced admin can change the settings and move the groups > anywhere, applications still need to parse /proc/mounts or use > appropriate library like libcgroup. Agreed. -- Balbir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/