Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:52:42 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
       "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
       "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
       cl@linux-foundation.org,
       "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] memcg make use of new percpu implementations
Message-Id: <20091106175242.6e13ee29.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 763
Lines: 25

Hi,

Recent updates on dynamic percpu allocation looks good and I tries to rewrite
memcg's poor implementation of percpu status counter.
(It's not NUMA-aware ...)
Thanks for great works.

For this time. I added Christoph to CC because I'm not fully sure my usage of
__this_cpu_xxx is correct...I'm glad if you check the usage when you have time.


Patch 1/2 is just clean up (prepare for patch 2/2)
Patch 2/2 is for percpu.

Tested on my 8cpu box and works well.
Pathcesa are against the latest mmotm.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/